[HACKERS] Re: AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

2001-03-16 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tried test cases with both journaling and non-journaling file systems? > Perhaps the flag choice would be markedly different for the different > options? Good point. Another reason we don't have enough data to nail this down yet. Anyway, the code is

Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

2001-03-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
t;>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 3/16/01, 9:11:51 AM, Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding [HACKERS] Re: AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC: > > > Okay ...

[HACKERS] Re: AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

2001-03-16 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> > Okay ... we can fall back to O_FSYNC if we don't see either of the > > others. No problem. Any other weird cases out there? I think Andreas > > might've muttered something about AIX but I'm not sure now. > You can safely use O_DSYNC on AIX, the only special on AIX is, > that it does not mak