[HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:04, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: If we were a bit earlier in the 9.0 cycle I would suggest that this confusion is a sufficient reason to drop the

[HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote: I think forcing an initdb might be more trouble than this wart is worth. +1. I would not make this change unless we have to force an initdb anyway. And I really hope we don't, because I'm sort of hoping the next 9.0 release

[HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Thom Brown
On 4 August 2010 20:25, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:04, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: If we were a bit earlier in the 9.0 cycle I would suggest

[HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:42, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote: I think forcing an initdb might be more trouble than this wart is worth. +1.  I would not make this change unless

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Josh Berkus
Great, I was afraid people would want another beta if we forced an initdb. So a hearty +1 for fixing it and not doing another beta (pending other bugs obviously). And, btw, there has been a lot of testing of pg_upgrade due to the initdbs and otherwise. I think 9.0 is going to have a pretty

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Thom Brown
On 4 August 2010 20:58, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote: Great, I was afraid people would want another beta if we forced an initdb.  So a hearty +1 for fixing it and not doing another beta (pending other bugs obviously). And, btw, there has been a lot of testing of pg_upgrade due to the

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread David Fetter
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:02:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote: On 4 August 2010 20:58, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote: Great, I was afraid people would want another beta if we forced an initdb.  So a hearty +1 for fixing it and not doing another beta (pending other bugs obviously).

[HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:04, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: If we were a bit earlier in the 9.0 cycle I would suggest that this confusion is a sufficient reason to drop the