On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:04, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If we were a bit earlier in the 9.0 cycle I would suggest that this
confusion is a sufficient reason to drop the
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
I think forcing an initdb might be more trouble than this wart is worth.
+1. I would not make this change unless we have to force an initdb
anyway. And I really hope we don't, because I'm sort of hoping the
next 9.0 release
On 4 August 2010 20:25, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:04, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If we were a bit earlier in the 9.0 cycle I would suggest
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:42, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
I think forcing an initdb might be more trouble than this wart is worth.
+1. I would not make this change unless
Great, I was afraid people would want another beta if we forced an
initdb. So a hearty +1 for fixing it and not doing another beta
(pending other bugs obviously).
And, btw, there has been a lot of testing of pg_upgrade due to the
initdbs and otherwise. I think 9.0 is going to have a pretty
On 4 August 2010 20:58, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Great, I was afraid people would want another beta if we forced an
initdb. So a hearty +1 for fixing it and not doing another beta
(pending other bugs obviously).
And, btw, there has been a lot of testing of pg_upgrade due to the
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:02:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
On 4 August 2010 20:58, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Great, I was afraid people would want another beta if we forced
an initdb. So a hearty +1 for fixing it and not doing another
beta (pending other bugs obviously).
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:04, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If we were a bit earlier in the 9.0 cycle I would suggest that this
confusion is a sufficient reason to drop the