Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can'timport to v7.1?

2001-04-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Philip Warner writes: > At 01:09 11/04/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > >Btw., it would really seem like a neat feature if a given pg_dump suite > >would also handle the respective previous version. > > This has been in the back of my mind for some time, and is why I initially > backported

Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can'timport to v7.1?

2001-04-11 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Joel Burton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > all I did was use pg_dumpall from v7.0.3 to dump to a text file, and > > "psql template1 < dumpfile" to load it back in again ... > > > > obviously this doesn't work like it has in the past? > > Marc --

Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can'timport to v7.1?

2001-04-10 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > > okay, not sure how we should document this, but apparently pg_dumpall > > doesn't work as the man page at: > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.0/user/app-pgdumpall.htm > > > > appears to suggest: > >

Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can'timport to v7.1?

2001-04-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
The Hermit Hacker writes: > okay, not sure how we should document this, but apparently pg_dumpall > doesn't work as the man page at: > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.0/user/app-pgdumpall.htm > > appears to suggest: > Now, I swore I did a 'setenv PGHOST db.hub.org' to get around