Philip Warner writes:
> At 01:09 11/04/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> >Btw., it would really seem like a neat feature if a given pg_dump suite
> >would also handle the respective previous version.
>
> This has been in the back of my mind for some time, and is why I initially
> backported
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Joel Burton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > all I did was use pg_dumpall from v7.0.3 to dump to a text file, and
> > "psql template1 < dumpfile" to load it back in again ...
> >
> > obviously this doesn't work like it has in the past?
>
> Marc --
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker writes:
>
> > okay, not sure how we should document this, but apparently pg_dumpall
> > doesn't work as the man page at:
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.0/user/app-pgdumpall.htm
> >
> > appears to suggest:
>
>
The Hermit Hacker writes:
> okay, not sure how we should document this, but apparently pg_dumpall
> doesn't work as the man page at:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.0/user/app-pgdumpall.htm
>
> appears to suggest:
> Now, I swore I did a 'setenv PGHOST db.hub.org' to get around