On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Daniel Verite wrote:
> For the record, attached are the collname that initdb now creates
> in pg_collation, when compiled successively with all current
> versions of ICU (49 to 59), versus what 10beta2 did.
>
> There are still a few names that get dropped along the
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 8/21/17 12:33, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Peter Eisentraut
>> wrote:
>>> Here are my patches to address this.
>>
>> These look good.
>
> Committed. That closes this open item.
Thanks again.
--
Peter
On 8/21/17 12:33, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>> Here are my patches to address this.
>
> These look good.
Committed. That closes this open item.
> One small piece of feedback: I suggest naming the custom collation
> "numeric" something e
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>> Here are my patches to address this.
>
> These look good.
Also, I don't know why en-u-kr-others-digit wasn't accepted by CREATE
COLLATION, as you said on the other thread just
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> Here are my patches to address this.
These look good.
One small piece of feedback: I suggest naming the custom collation
"numeric" something else instead: "natural". Apparently, the behavior
it implements is sometimes called natural sort
On 8/19/17 19:15, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Noah Misch wrote:
>> I think you're contending that, as formulated, this is not a valid v10 open
>> item. Are you?
>
> As the person that came up with this formulation, I'd like to give a
> quick summary of my current understanding of the item's status:
Noah Misch wrote:
I think you're contending that, as formulated, this is not a valid v10 open
item. Are you?
As the person that came up with this formulation, I'd like to give a
quick summary of my current understanding of the item's status:
* We're in agreement that we ought to have initdb
On 8/17/17 23:13, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I haven't read anything since that has provided any more clarity about
>> what needs changing here. I will entertain concrete proposals about the
>> specific points above (considering any other issues under discussion to
>> be PG11 material), but in the absen
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:22:07PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 8/14/17 12:23, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 8/13/17 15:39, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly
> >> send
> >> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for
On 8/14/17 12:23, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 8/13/17 15:39, Noah Misch wrote:
>> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
>> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
>> status
>> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownersh
On 8/13/17 15:39, Noah Misch wrote:
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2017040
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 04:51:16AM +, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 06:23:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > > On 8/6/17 20:07, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > >> I've looked into this. I'll give an example of what keyword variants
> > >> there are for Greek,
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 06:23:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > On 8/6/17 20:07, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> >> I've looked into this. I'll give an example of what keyword variants
> >> there are for Greek, and then discuss what I think each is.
>
> > I'm not sure why we wan
13 matches
Mail list logo
