Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Why? We are able to construct all the non-nailed relcache entries
>> from scratch during backend startup. That seems a sufficient
>> proof that we can reconstruct any or all of them on demand.
> Hmm,why is it sufficent ?
> At backen
Tom Lane wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My concern is the robustness of rel cache.
> > It seems pretty dangerous to discard system relation
> > descriptors used for cache mechanism especially in
> > case of error recovery.
> > It also seems pretty dangerous to recontruct re
Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My concern is the robustness of rel cache.
> It seems pretty dangerous to discard system relation
> descriptors used for cache mechanism especially in
> case of error recovery.
> It also seems pretty dangerous to recontruct relation
> descriptors especia
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Does this occur after a prior error message? I have been suspicious
> >> because there isn't a mechanism to clear the syscache-busy flags during
> >> xact abort.
>
> > I don't know if I've seen the cases you pointed out.
> > I hav
I wrote:
> On top of that, we have the issue I was concerned about that there is
> no mechanism for clearing the cache-busy flags during xact abort.
Hmm, brain cells must be fading fast. On looking into the code I
find that there *is* such a mechanism --- installed by yours truly,
only three mon
