On 2015-07-28 18:59:02 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
Unless somebody protests soon I'm going to push something like that
after having dinner.
Done.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-07-28 18:59:02 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
Unless somebody protests soon I'm going to push something like that
after having dinner.
Done.
Yay!
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-07-28 18:59:02 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
Attached are:
a) a slightly evolved version of Michael's patch disabling renegotiation
by default that I'm planning to apply to 9.4 - 9.0
b) a patch removing
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-07-11 21:09:05 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
Something like the patches attached
Thanks for that!
could be considered, one is for master
and REL9_5_STABLE to remove ssl_renegotiation_limit, the second one
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-07-01 23:32:23 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
We'd need to be triply confident that we know better than the DBA before
removing flexibility in back branches.
+1 for just changing the default.
I think we do. But I
On 2015-07-11 21:09:05 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
Something like the patches attached
Thanks for that!
could be considered, one is for master
and REL9_5_STABLE to remove ssl_renegotiation_limit, the second one for
~REL9_4_STABLE to change the default to 0.
diff --git
On 2015-07-01 23:32:23 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
We'd need to be triply confident that we know better than the DBA before
removing flexibility in back branches.
+1 for just changing the default.
I think we do. But I also think that I pretty clearly lost this
argument, so let's just change the
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 06:13:36PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-06-27 12:10:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-06-27 15:07:05 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
+1 for removing on master and just disabling on back-branches.
The problem with
