Re: [HACKERS] Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd)

2001-01-26 Thread Tom Lane
Tim Perdue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do we need to do a bunch of testing on Beta3 before deployment or is it > so much more stable that it absolutely will have no problems? Well, it's more stable than any pre-beta snapshot is likely to be ... > We haven't had any problems with the ~Nov 17 sn

Re: [HACKERS] Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd)

2001-01-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Do we need to do a bunch of testing on Beta3 before deployment or is it > so much more stable that it absolutely will have no problems? > > We haven't had any problems with the ~Nov 17 snapshot, so we figure why mess > with a good thing. Well, seeing as we never tested the Nov 17 snapshot, and

[HACKERS] Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd)

2001-01-26 Thread Tim Perdue
Do we need to do a bunch of testing on Beta3 before deployment or is it so much more stable that it absolutely will have no problems? We haven't had any problems with the ~Nov 17 snapshot, so we figure why mess with a good thing. Tim On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:23:30PM -0500, Jeff Duffy wrote: