On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Obviously, these objections are not strong enough to keep us from
> increasing the standard value of NAMEDATALEN if it seems that many
> people are running into the limit. But AFAICT relatively few people
> have such problems, and I'm hesitant to make every
Joel Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Have you thought about simply increasing NAMEDATALEN in your
>> installation? If you really are generating names that aren't unique
>> in 31 characters, that seems like the way to go ...
> Other than (a) it wastes a bit of space in the pg_ tables, and (
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes:
> >> Seems to me that if you want a bunch of CREATEs to be mutually
> >> dependent, then you wrap them all in a BEGIN/END block.
>
> > Yes, but... The second and third commands weren't supposed to be
> > related to
