[HACKERS] Re: curious regression failures (was Re: [PATCHES] PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded)

2007-09-19 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom Lane wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ! ERROR: could not read block 2 of relation 1663/16384/2606: read only 0 of 8192 bytes Is that repeatable? What sort of filesystem are

[HACKERS] Re: curious regression failures (was Re: [PATCHES] PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded)

2007-09-19 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: >> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ! ERROR: could not read block 2 of relation 1663/16384/2606: read > only 0 of 8192 bytes >>>

[HACKERS] Re: curious regression failures (was Re: [PATCHES] PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded)

2007-09-19 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom Lane wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ! ERROR: could not read block 2 of relation 1663/16384/2606: read only 0 of 8192 bytes Is that repeatable? What sort of filesystem are you testing on? (soft-mou