On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 01:18:24PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:29:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > > I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
> > > > The attached patch fixes this. Th
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:29:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
> > > The attached patch fixes this. This should prevent the warning.
> >
> > Surely that's just going to move t
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:29:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
> > The attached patch fixes this. This should prevent the warning.
>
> Surely that's just going to move the errors somewhere else. The ca
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
> The attached patch fixes this. This should prevent the warning.
Surely that's just going to move the errors somewhere else. The call
site still expects the argument to be int[].
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:50:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute
> -Wformat-security -fno-s
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:50:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute
> > -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard
>
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The best alternative I can think of is to use strncmp() to check for
>> whether the head of the string matches "COPY ", and then perform the
>> integer conversion using strtoull() #ifdef HAVE_STRTOULL and strtoul()
>> o
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The best alternative I can think of is to use strncmp() to check for
> whether the head of the string matches "COPY ", and then perform the
> integer conversion using strtoull() #ifdef HAVE_STRTOULL and strtoul()
> otherwise.
What about the attach
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>> c:/mingw/msys/1.0/home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.5100/../pgsql/contrib/pg_stat_statements/pg_stat_statements.c:
>> In function 'pgss_ProcessUtility':
>> c:/mingw/msys/1.0/home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.510
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute
> -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g
> -I../../../
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/15/2014 04:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> > wrote:
> >>Ok, I committed #undefs. I don't have a Mingw(-w64) environment to test
> >>with, so let's see if the buildfarm likes it.
> >There does not seem to be a b
On 05/15/2014 04:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
Ok, I committed #undefs. I don't have a Mingw(-w64) environment to test
with, so let's see if the buildfarm likes it.
There does not seem to be a buildfarm machine using MinGW-w64...
Jac
On 05/14/2014 06:06 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:51:24PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/14/2014 05:37 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:15:38PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
MinGW:
http://sourceforge.net/
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:51:24PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/14/2014 05:37 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> >On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:15:38PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >>On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> >>>MinGW:
> >>>http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/mingw-org-wsl/ci/mast
On 05/14/2014 05:37 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:15:38PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
MinGW:
http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/mingw-org-wsl/ci/master/tree/include/stdio.h#l467
MinGW-w64:
http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/code/HE
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:15:38PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> >MinGW:
> >http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/mingw-org-wsl/ci/master/tree/include/stdio.h#l467
> >MinGW-w64:
> >http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/mingw-w64-headers/
On 05/14/2014 08:15 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:14:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
I'm pretty sure we need this on Mingw - this SYSTEMQUOTE stuff dates
back well before 8.3, IIRC, which is when we first
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:14:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
I'm pretty sure we need this on Mingw - this SYSTEMQUOTE stuff dates
back well before 8.3, IIRC, which is when we first got full MSVC support.
I tried googling for some
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:14:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
> > I'm pretty sure we need this on Mingw - this SYSTEMQUOTE stuff dates
> > back well before 8.3, IIRC, which is when we first got full MSVC support.
>
> I tried googling for some info on this, and got a number o
19 matches
Mail list logo
