On 12/2/2004 8:16 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will
> continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically
> saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will
> > continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically
> > saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we perhaps can keep
> > fixes for 8.0
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will
> continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically
> saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we perhaps can keep
> fixes for 8.0.1.
In my mind "RC" means
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will
> > continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically
> > saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we perhaps can keep
> >
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will
continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically
saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we perhaps can keep
fixes for 8.0.1.
critical bug fixes should be
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go
> > >> for RC1.
> > >
> > > Considering that you just added at least three new and completely
>
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go
> >> for RC1.
> >
> > Considering that you just added at least three new and completely
> > untested features, I don't think R
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go
for RC1.
Considering that you just added at least three new and completely
untested features, I don't think RC1 is the way to go.
I have to agree here ... I'd do a
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go
> for RC1.
Considering that you just added at least three new and completely
untested features, I don't think RC1 is the way to go.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go
for RC1. These are the open items. I think we will just have to move
them to the TODO list tomorrow, except for the documentation items.
---
10 matches
Mail list logo