Re: [HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-03 Thread Jan Wieck
On 12/2/2004 8:16 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will > continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically > saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we

Re: [HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will > > continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically > > saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we perhaps can keep > > fixes for 8.0

Re: [HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will > continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically > saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we perhaps can keep > fixes for 8.0.1. In my mind "RC" means

Re: [HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will > > continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically > > saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we perhaps can keep > >

Re: [HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-02 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: One more issue. Until we start RC, patches that are bug fixes will continue to be applied. Do we want that? By going RC we are basically saying we need to focus on docs and packaging and we perhaps can keep fixes for 8.0.1. critical bug fixes should be

Re: [HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go > > >> for RC1. > > > > > > Considering that you just added at least three new and completely >

Re: [HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go > >> for RC1. > > > > Considering that you just added at least three new and completely > > untested features, I don't think R

Re: [HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-02 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go for RC1. Considering that you just added at least three new and completely untested features, I don't think RC1 is the way to go. I have to agree here ... I'd do a

Re: [HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go > for RC1. Considering that you just added at least three new and completely untested features, I don't think RC1 is the way to go. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

[HACKERS] Ready for RC1

2004-12-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have applied all outstanding patches and I think we are ready to go for RC1. These are the open items. I think we will just have to move them to the TODO list tomorrow, except for the documentation items. ---