=?iso-8859-1?q?Mamta=20Singh?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, give me some idea as to what do we
> need to change to implement undo-file.
It's very unlikely that we'll ever implement WAL-based UNDO.
No one has given any convincing reason to think it's a good idea.
re
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:53:02AM +0100, Mamta Singh wrote:
>> I went thru the site
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/wal-benefits-later.html
> I see that most of this document is obsolete.
Yeah, I was planning to remove that section or at
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:53:02AM +0100, Mamta Singh wrote:
> I went thru the site
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/wal-benefits-later.html
I see that most of this document is obsolete. It mentions:
1. with UNDO it will be possible to remove pg_clog.
(already possible, another me
Hi,
I went thru the site
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/wal-benefits-later.html
Undo operation is not implemented. and information of
the status regarding the transaction is stored in the
permanent file pg_clog. But I have not been able to
see the format of the file, as this file is
