On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a look at this with a view to committing it but
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
The part about the planning parameter looks good, thanks. The places
used to mention the databases used also makes more sense. Thanks for
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a look at this with a view to committing it but on examination
I'm not sure this is the best way to proceed. The proposed text
documents that the tests should be run in a database called
regression, but
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a look at this with a view to committing it but on examination
I'm not sure this is the best way to proceed. The proposed text
Hi,
For the documentation patch, I propose the attached to avoid future
confusions. Comments? It might make sense to back-patch as well.
Compiles, didn't find any typos and I think it is comprehensible.
Looks fine for me.
Best regards,
--
Christian Kruse
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
For the documentation patch, I propose the attached to avoid future
confusions. Comments? It might make sense to back-patch as well.
Compiles, didn't find any typos and I think it is comprehensible.
I took a
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
For the documentation patch, I propose the attached to avoid future
confusions. Comments? It might make sense to back-patch as well.
Hi all,
It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they are
run on a database not named regression:
- updatable_views
- foreign_data
- sequence
Those tests are failing because some relations of information_schemas
contain information that are database-dependent. Please see the
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Those tests are failing because some relations of information_schemas
contain information that are database-dependent.
I forgot to mention that it is our QE team at VMware that reported me
a portion of this failure,
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they are
run on a database not named regression:
This does not seem like a bug to me, although maybe we'd better update the
documentation to specify that you need to use a DB named
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they are
run on a database not named regression:
This does not seem like a bug to me, although maybe we'd better
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they are
run on a database not named regression:
This does not seem
On 2013/12/06, at 3:52, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
It happens that the following regression tests are failing if they
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 17:12 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
IMHO, the regression test suite would gain in consistency and
portability if we do not refer to data that is database-dependent.
I once did some similar fixes (e3d9dceef62e072cf9a433ae6c74a1c5a10d94d3)
but then didn't pursue it any
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 17:12 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
IMHO, the regression test suite would gain in consistency and
portability if we do not refer to data that is database-dependent.
I once did some similar fixes
15 matches
Mail list logo
