> >I've got a clue for ApplixWare, if you happen to have that package
> >(US$90).
> Please post it, Thomas.
> I got nowhere following their instructions.
Have you looked at *our* instructions in the chapter on ODBC? I haven't
done much with it in quite a while, but afaik it all should still w
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:53:31AM +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
...
> I think I've fixed this bug at least for MS-Access.
> You could get the latest win32 driver from
> ftp://ftp.greatbridge.org/pub/pgadmin/stable/psqlodbc.zip .
> Please try it.
How can I just install that file? (ie., M$ Access
> -Original Message-
> From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 March 2001 02:05
> To: Patrick Welche
> Cc: Tom Lane; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Re: [HAC
At 17:54 27/02/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>The Hermit Hacker writes:
>
> > Are there any major outstandings that ppl have on their plates,
> > that should prevent a release? I'd like to put out an RC1 by Friday this
> > week, with a full release schedualed for March 15th ... this wou
At 11:52 26/02/01 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>Morning all ...
>
> Are there any major outstandings that ppl have on their plates,
>that should prevent a release? I'd like to put out an RC1 by Friday this
>week, with a full release schedualed for March 15th ... this would give
>Thoma
Patrick Welche wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:53:31AM +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> ...
> > I think I've fixed this bug at least for MS-Access.
> > You could get the latest win32 driver from
> > ftp://ftp.greatbridge.org/pub/pgadmin/stable/psqlodbc.zip .
> > Please try it.
>
> How can I
> >I've got a clue for ApplixWare, if you happen to have that package
> >(US$90).
> Please post it, Thomas.
> I got nowhere following their instructions.
Uh, who's instructions? We have a writeup on Applix and ODBC in the
docs. Have you found those, or are those falling short of helpful?
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>> I have a copy of OpenOffice for LinuxPPC but have not figured out how to
>> tell it to connect to Postgres. If someone can slip me a clue on how to
>> configure it and do simple database stuff with it, I'll try to clean up
>> the most pressing ODBC problems befor
> I have a copy of OpenOffice for LinuxPPC but have not figured out how to
> tell it to connect to Postgres. If someone can slip me a clue on how to
> configure it and do simple database stuff with it, I'll try to clean up
> the most pressing ODBC problems before we release.
I've got a clue for
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Emmanuel Charpentier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yep ! As of beta4, the ODBC driver is still seriously broken (the
> > original libpsqlodbc.so.0.26 doesn't even connect. A version patched by
> > Nick Gorham allows some connectivity (you can query the DB), but still
> > has
Emmanuel Charpentier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yep ! As of beta4, the ODBC driver is still seriously broken (the
> original libpsqlodbc.so.0.26 doesn't even connect. A version patched by
> Nick Gorham allows some connectivity (you can query the DB), but still
> has some serious breakage (i. e.
The Hermit Hacker writes:
> Are there any major outstandings that ppl have on their plates,
> that should prevent a release? I'd like to put out an RC1 by Friday this
> week, with a full release schedualed for March 15th ... this would give
> Thomas his two weeks for the docs freeze ...
I
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Morning all ...
>
> Are there any major outstandings that ppl have on their plates,
> that should prevent a release? I'd like to put out an RC1 by Friday this
> week, with a full release schedualed for March 15th ... this would give
> Thomas his two weeks fo
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>
> > Are there any major outstandings that ppl have on their plates,
> > that should prevent a release?
>
> Imho startup after a failing WAL recovery is a 'must do' before release,
> as Tom pointed out. Remember that you can currently run in
> Are there any major outstandings that ppl have on their plates,
> that should prevent a release?
Imho startup after a failing WAL recovery is a 'must do' before release,
as Tom pointed out. Remember that you can currently run into this situation
with as easy a mistake as running out of d
Morning all ...
Are there any major outstandings that ppl have on their plates,
that should prevent a release? I'd like to put out an RC1 by Friday this
week, with a full release schedualed for March 15th ... this would give
Thomas his two weeks for the docs freeze ...
Basicall
16 matches
Mail list logo
