On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:55:07AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I think this has very little to do with commitfest schedules, and much
> > more with the "early" forking of the new version branch. For both 9.4
> > and 9.5 we essentially spen
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-01-20 10:40:14 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> We have gotten off of that cycle in the last two major releases, and
>> this isn't going to improve as long as we have commitfests starting
>> after January.
>
> I think this has very lit
On 01/20/2016 07:40 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Our current 9.5/9.6 timing looks more like the 8.X series of release
dates. Everyone might be fine with that, but we had better be prepared
for November-February major release dates going forward.
Bruce,
Thank you for bringing this up it is a good
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:48:16PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-01-20 10:40:14 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We have gotten off of that cycle in the last two major releases, and
> > this isn't going to improve as long as we have commitfests starting
> > after January.
>
> I think this h
On 2016-01-20 10:40:14 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We have gotten off of that cycle in the last two major releases, and
> this isn't going to improve as long as we have commitfests starting
> after January.
I think this has very little to do with commitfest schedules, and much
more with the "ear
Many people where happy with our consistent releasing major releases in
September, e.g. 9.0 to 9.3:
9.5 2016-01-07
9.4 2014-12-18
9.3 2013-09-09 <--
9.2 2012-09-10 <--
9.1 2011-09-12 <--
9.0 2010-09-20 <--
8.4 2009-07-01
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
