Joel Jacobson wrote:
> Hi Joachim,
>
> Attached, please find new patch. Test unchanged.
This was committed, as discussed in the original patch's thread.
It would be great if reviewers could reply to the email that submits the
patch, instead of creating a thread of their own. It helps keep thing
Hi Joachim,
Attached, please find new patch. Test unchanged.
Best regards,
Joel
> Patch looks good, all concerns that had been raised previously have
> been addressed in this version of the patch.
>
> The only thing that IMO needs to change is a stylistic issue:
>
> if (fout->remoteVersion >= 8
Patch looks good, all concerns that had been raised previously have
been addressed in this version of the patch.
The only thing that IMO needs to change is a stylistic issue:
if (fout->remoteVersion >= 80200)
{
[...]
(fout->remoteVersion >= 80400) ?
"pg_catalog.pg_get_function_identity_ar
