Hi,
I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think you're making things more complicated when they should be
>> getting simpler.
>>
>> It strikes me that the current API of "pass t
Fujii Masao writes:
> But there is one issue; the extra search is always required to send a notify
> interrupt. This is because pg_listener doesn't have a backend ID and we
> cannot pass it to SendProcSignal. In order to solve this issue, we should
> newly add backend ID field into pg_listener?
H
Fujii Masao writes:
> I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
Applied with some mostly-cosmetic editorial work.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.o
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao writes:
>> I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
>
> Applied with some mostly-cosmetic editorial work.
>
> regards, tom lane
Awesome, congrats.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgs
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao writes:
>> I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
>
> Applied with some mostly-cosmetic editorial work.
Thank you very much!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software
