Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Piskorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another thing I've been wondering about, but haven't been able to find
any discussion of:
Just how closely tied is PostgreSQL to its use of shared memory?
Pretty damn closely. You would not be happy with the performance of
anything that
Le jeu 08/07/2004 à 14:22, Andrew Piskorski a écrit :
You want to do clustering for failover/reliability reasons, for
performance/scalability reasons, or for both?
for all that of course :)
For some stuff to read, see the dozen or so links I posted here:
Andrew Piskorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another thing I've been wondering about, but haven't been able to find
any discussion of:
Just how closely tied is PostgreSQL to its use of shared memory?
Pretty damn closely. You would not be happy with the performance of
anything that tried to
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 12:39:34PM +0200, Yannick Lecaillez wrote:
Thanks a lot for all people which answer.
I have this clustering on SAN problem today and i think it could be
less harder to implement this today than it was for Oracle in 1993
You want to do clustering for
