Re: [HACKERS] SET TRANSACTION .. DEFERRABLE missing docs?

2011-03-07 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 06.03.2011 23:33, Kevin Grittner wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: I was reading through ref/set_transaction.sgml and noticed that the only documentation of DEFERRABLE is that it's a PostgreSQL language extension, not anything about what it actually does. Same for begin and start_transaction. I

Re: [HACKERS] SET TRANSACTION .. DEFERRABLE missing docs?

2011-03-06 Thread Kevin Grittner
Magnus Hagander wrote: > I was reading through ref/set_transaction.sgml and noticed that the > only documentation of DEFERRABLE is that it's a PostgreSQL language > extension, not anything about what it actually does. Same for begin > and start_transaction. I see it described in README-SSI and f

Re: [HACKERS] SET TRANSACTION .. DEFERRABLE missing docs?

2011-03-05 Thread Kevin Grittner
Magnus Hagander wrote: > I was reading through ref/set_transaction.sgml and noticed that the > only documentation of DEFERRABLE is that it's a PostgreSQL language > extension, not anything about what it actually does. Same for begin > and start_transaction. I see it described in README-SSI and f

[HACKERS] SET TRANSACTION .. DEFERRABLE missing docs?

2011-03-05 Thread Magnus Hagander
I was reading through ref/set_transaction.sgml and noticed that the only documentation of DEFERRABLE is that it's a PostgreSQL language extension, not anything about what it actually does. Same for begin and start_transaction. I see it described in README-SSI and for the guc default_transaction_def