I assume you guys know where to go to get the complete sql:2011 spec:
http://www.iso.org/iso/search.htm?qt=9075&searchSubmit=Search&sort=rel&type=simple&published=true
But if time/money is an issue the following seems to be the best publicly
available description of the temporal features:
http:/
On Jan 2, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> * Named arguments in function calls: done since PG 9.0; and we're
> phasing out the => operator.
We don’t support `=>` for params yet, right? Still just `:=`?
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
Hello
2012/1/2 Peter Eisentraut :
> On mån, 2012-01-02 at 09:33 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
trim_array can be simply implemented for one dim array. I am not sure
about semantic for multidim arrays.
Regards
Pavel
--
Sen
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On mån, 2012-01-02 at 09:33 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
>>
>> We seem quite close on temporal stuff, so maybe just a little syntax work?
>
> I am aware of this piece
On mån, 2012-01-02 at 09:33 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
>
> We seem quite close on temporal stuff, so maybe just a little syntax work?
I am aware of this piece on what's new in SQL:2011:
http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/
Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
We seem quite close on temporal stuff, so maybe just a little syntax work?
Not sure and not planning anything myself, just checking.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 2
