On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> That does seem better. Thanks.
OK, committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your sub
Robert Haas wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> I'm certainly open to suggestions for better wording.
> How about something like this:
>
> When the system is forced to combine multiple page-level predicate
> locks into a single relation-level predicate lock because the
> predicate lock table i
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> The attached patch addresses one of the open non-blockers for beta3.
>
> These are tuning points which emerged in testing. The first is more
> likely to be helpful. The second may be very important in a few
> types of transaction mixes, bu
The attached patch addresses one of the open non-blockers for beta3.
These are tuning points which emerged in testing. The first is more
likely to be helpful. The second may be very important in a few
types of transaction mixes, but I threw in a lot of weasel words and
qualifiers because someon
