On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 16:22, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 16:21, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>> * Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>>> However, i think the code path down around the error message is simply
>>> incorrect. That #ifdef spaghetti is pretty hard to parse, but it gives
>>>
* Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net) wrote:
> They were taken out of the main packaging due to them being a PITA to
> deal with in general, IIRC.
Yes, making it very difficult for those of us who still need them. :(
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 16:21, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> * Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> However, i think the code path down around the error message is simply
>> incorrect. That #ifdef spaghetti is pretty hard to parse, but it gives
>> the wrong error message (we should say it's sspi that's not av
* Magnus Hagander wrote:
However, i think the code path down around the error message is simply
incorrect. That #ifdef spaghetti is pretty hard to parse, but it gives
the wrong error message (we should say it's sspi that's not available
when we have none of the two options) and/or a "duplicate c
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 16:02, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> * Christian Ullrich wrote:
>
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 14:11, Christian Ullrich
>>> wrote:
>
This change has been tested and works correctly on FreeBSD 8.1, using
the Kerberos and GSSAPI libraries from
* Christian Ullrich wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 14:11, Christian Ullrich
wrote:
This change has been tested and works correctly on FreeBSD 8.1, using
the Kerberos and GSSAPI libraries from Heimdal 1.4. The server is
running PostgreSQL 9.0.2 on Windows 2008.
Does
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 14:11, Christian Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
this patch adds support for connecting to servers running on Windows
and requesting SSPI authentication. It does this by treating
AUTH_REQ_SSPI the same as AUTH_REQ_GSS if no native SSPI support is
availab
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 14:11, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> this patch adds support for connecting to servers running on Windows
> and requesting SSPI authentication. It does this by treating
> AUTH_REQ_SSPI the same as AUTH_REQ_GSS if no native SSPI support is
> available.
>
> In addi
* Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Christian Ullrich wrote:
this patch adds support for connecting to servers running on Windows
and requesting SSPI authentication. It does this by treating
AUTH_REQ_SSPI the same as AUTH_REQ_GSS if no native SSPI support is
available.
I h
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> this patch adds support for connecting to servers running on Windows
> and requesting SSPI authentication. It does this by treating
> AUTH_REQ_SSPI the same as AUTH_REQ_GSS if no native SSPI support is
> available.
I have to confess that
Hello all,
this patch adds support for connecting to servers running on Windows
and requesting SSPI authentication. It does this by treating
AUTH_REQ_SSPI the same as AUTH_REQ_GSS if no native SSPI support is
available.
In addition to being generally useful, this is a workaround to a
problem wit
11 matches
Mail list logo
