Re: [HACKERS] Schedule, feature freeze, etc

2004-07-03 Thread Andreas Pflug
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: What about features that have been submitting patches and trying to get included for a few weeks now. Specificially, I'm concerned with pg_autovacuum backend integration. I know people have been busy frying bigger fish, so the patch probably hasn't recieved much revi

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule, feature freeze, etc

2004-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Okay folks, it's July 1, and the long-threatened feature freeze for 7.5 >> is now in place. > What about features that have been submitting patches and trying to get > included for a few weeks now. I already said that everyth

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule, feature freeze, etc

2004-07-01 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Tom Lane wrote: Okay folks, it's July 1, and the long-threatened feature freeze for 7.5 is now in place. That means future patches that introduce new features will be held off till the next development cycle. Bug fixes, cleanup of loose ends, and (ahem) documentation are of course still welcome.

[HACKERS] Schedule, feature freeze, etc

2004-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
Okay folks, it's July 1, and the long-threatened feature freeze for 7.5 is now in place. That means future patches that introduce new features will be held off till the next development cycle. Bug fixes, cleanup of loose ends, and (ahem) documentation are of course still welcome. Since we've jus