p-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
Ph: (510) 642-8072
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2003 12:33 pm
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Separate shared_buffer management process
>
> Added to TODO:
>
> * Us
Added to TODO:
* Use background process to write dirty shared buffers to disk
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Would it be a good idea to have a separate shared buffer process to
>
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be a good idea to have a separate shared buffer process to
> manage the cache? Could such a process take workload off of the main
> backend and improve their performance?
> Just an idea?
I can't recall if this has been discussed on the list, b
Would it be a good idea to have a separate shared buffer process to
manage the cache? Could such a process take workload off of the main
backend and improve their performance?
Just an idea?
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
