Re: [HACKERS] Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review

2002-05-12 Thread Ian Barwick
> > See contrib/dblink. The version in cvs HEAD has two that return sets -- > dblink() which returns an int, and dblink_get_pkey() which returns text. Thanks, now I can see what I was doing wrong Yours Ian Barwick ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4

Re: [HACKERS] Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review

2002-05-11 Thread Joe Conway
Ian Barwick wrote: > On Monday 06 May 2002 18:51, Joe Conway wrote: > (...) > >>Request for help: >>- >>So far I've tested with SQL and C functions. > > (...) > > Can you post an example of a function in C? > (I'm trying out your patch from Friday). > > > Thanks, > > Ian Bar

Re: [HACKERS] Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review and comment

2002-05-11 Thread Ian Barwick
On Monday 06 May 2002 18:51, Joe Conway wrote: (...) > Request for help: > - > So far I've tested with SQL and C functions. (...) Can you post an example of a function in C? (I'm trying out your patch from Friday). Thanks, Ian Barwick ---(end of broadc

Re: [HACKERS] Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review and comment

2002-05-06 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
ect: [HACKERS] Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch > review and comment > > > I've been buried in the backend parser/planner/executor now for the last > 2 weeks or so, and I now have a patch for a working implementation of > SRFs as RTEs (i.e. "SELECT tbl.* FROM

[HACKERS] Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review and comment

2002-05-06 Thread Joe Conway
I've been buried in the backend parser/planner/executor now for the last 2 weeks or so, and I now have a patch for a working implementation of SRFs as RTEs (i.e. "SELECT tbl.* FROM myfunc() AS tbl"). I think I'm at a good point to get review and comments. Not everything yet has been implemente