> On 16 Mar 2017, at 23:20, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Thomas Munro writes:
>> Naive replacement in new files (present in master but not in 9.6) with
>> the attached script, followed by a couple of manual corrections where
>> Size was really an
Thomas Munro writes:
> Naive replacement in new files (present in master but not in 9.6) with
> the attached script, followed by a couple of manual corrections where
> Size was really an English word in a comment, gets the attached diff.
In the case of mmgr/slab.c,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-03-16 17:24:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> >> On 2017-03-16 16:59:29 -0400, Robert Haas
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2017-03-16 17:24:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The short answer to that is that "Size" predates the universal acceptance
>> of size_t. If we were making these decisions today, or anytime since the
>> early 2000s, we'd surely have just gone with
On 2017-03-16 17:24:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On 2017-03-16 16:59:29 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> I guess I assumed that we wouldn't have defined PG-specific types
Robert Haas writes:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-03-16 16:59:29 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I guess I assumed that we wouldn't have defined PG-specific types if
>>> we wanted to just use the OS-supplied ones.
>>
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-03-16 16:59:29 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Thomas Munro
>> wrote:
>> > Noticing that the assembled hackers don't seem to agree on $SUBJECT in
>> >
On 2017-03-16 16:59:29 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
> > Noticing that the assembled hackers don't seem to agree on $SUBJECT in
> > new patches, I decided to plot counts of lines matching \ and
> >
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> Noticing that the assembled hackers don't seem to agree on $SUBJECT in
> new patches, I decided to plot counts of lines matching \ and
> \ over time. After a very long run in the lead, size_t
Hi,
Noticing that the assembled hackers don't seem to agree on $SUBJECT in
new patches, I decided to plot counts of lines matching \ and
\ over time. After a very long run in the lead, size_t has
recently been left in the dust by Size.
--
Thomas Munro
10 matches
Mail list logo