Working on the git conversion with keywords, and I've noticed a couple of
strange things that don't come up the same way in git. All of these are in
non-code files, but they do defeat the identical tarball mode.
For example, a number of files have commits showing up in cvs with nothing at
all
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
I'm also seeing some entries tagged with vendor branch, such as:
http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/storage/smgr/README
revision 1.1.1.1
Same issue there, the file comes out on the other end with the
wrong keyword (in
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 15:31, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
I'm also seeing some entries tagged with vendor branch, such as:
http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/storage/smgr/README
revision 1.1.1.1
Same
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
I believe revision 1.1.1.1 is normally seen only for file brought
in through the cvs import command. vendor branch would make
some sense as a commit message for an import.
Yeah, something like that. But why do we for the file above have
one
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Working on the git conversion with keywords, and I've noticed a couple of
strange things that don't come up the same way in git. All of these are in
non-code files, but they do defeat the identical tarball mode.
For example, a number of files have commits showing up in
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 20:42, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Working on the git conversion with keywords, and I've noticed a couple of
strange things that don't come up the same way in git. All of these are in
non-code files, but they do defeat the identical
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I have reproduced this by modifying just the CVS tag:
? ? ? ?$PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/catalog/README,v 1.15 2010/07/20
? ? ? ?18:38:53 momjian Exp $
To clarify with what Bruce said on IM to me, the situation is when the
workflow is to manually copy a file
On tis, 2010-07-20 at 20:46 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
For one thing, this showed up in a lot of .po files for 8.1.0RC1.
Peter, can you comment on if this coincides with the tools you use to
do those things?
There are/were some games being played with the key words, so this
effect sounds
On tis, 2010-07-20 at 15:12 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Working on the git conversion
What's the tool that is being used now? Can you keep us up to date on
the options etc. you plan to use?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
+On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 21:15, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tis, 2010-07-20 at 15:12 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Working on the git conversion
What's the tool that is being used now? Can you keep us up to date on
the options etc. you plan to use?
I'm currently running tests
10 matches
Mail list logo
