Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2004-01-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Oliver Elphick wrote: I can't very easily get cvs tip built on linus-hppa, because I couldn't make a package of that except for experimental, but experimental doesn't get processed by the autobuilders. Time to break out the old configure; make; make install... ---(end

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2004-01-02 Thread Oliver Elphick
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 22:20, Tom Lane wrote: My object is to get 7.4.1 working on all the Debian architectures. I'd have been more willing to buy into that goal if you'd been working on it during the 7.4 beta test cycle. I gather from what you are saying that you couldn't, because Debian

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2004-01-01 Thread Tom Lane
Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 03:22, Oliver Elphick wrote: What is needed to provide spinlock support for linux on hppa? Possibly nothing --- can you try CVS tip? Bruce has already committed his patch to decouple CPU and OS assumptions there, and I changed the

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2004-01-01 Thread Oliver Elphick
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 17:58, Tom Lane wrote: Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 03:22, Oliver Elphick wrote: What is needed to provide spinlock support for linux on hppa? Possibly nothing --- can you try CVS tip? Bruce has already committed his patch to

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2004-01-01 Thread Tom Lane
Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I saw the changes to s_lock.h, but I couldn't at first sight see how to alter 7.4.1 to incorporate them, because they coincided with a file reorganisation. That's right. The change depends on Bruce's reorganization of the spinlock configuration

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2004-01-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: I think it might be possible to develop a localized patch for 7.4 that only affects linux-hppa and doesn't risk breaking anything else: copy the slock_t definition for hppa from hpux.h into linux.h and add the inline'd version of hppa tas() from CVS tip into s_lock.h. But I'm

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2004-01-01 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: ... copy the slock_t definition for hppa from hpux.h into linux.h ... I think he also has to modify src/include/port/linux.h to support the HP processor. That's what I said, I thought. regards, tom lane

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2004-01-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: ... copy the slock_t definition for hppa from hpux.h into linux.h ... I think he also has to modify src/include/port/linux.h to support the HP processor. That's what I said, I thought. Oh, I saw slock_t

[HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2003-12-31 Thread Oliver Elphick
What is needed to provide spinlock support for linux on hppa? make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/postgresql-7.4.1/build-tree/postgresql-7.4.1/src/backend/access/transam' ... hppa-linux-gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -pipe

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

2003-12-31 Thread Oliver Elphick
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 03:22, Oliver Elphick wrote: What is needed to provide spinlock support for linux on hppa? I should add that 7.3.4 built OK. -- Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: