Re: [HACKERS] Standby receiving part of missing WAL segment

2015-02-12 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote: Today I witnessed a situation which appears to have gone down like this: - The primary server starting streaming WAL data from segment 00A8 to the standby - The standby server started receiving that data - Before 00A8 is

Re: [HACKERS] Standby receiving part of missing WAL segment

2015-02-12 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote: On 12 February 2015 at 13:56, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote: Today I witnessed a situation which appears to have gone down like this: - The

Re: [HACKERS] Standby receiving part of missing WAL segment

2015-02-12 Thread Thom Brown
On 12 February 2015 at 13:56, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote: Today I witnessed a situation which appears to have gone down like this: - The primary server starting streaming WAL data from segment 00A8 to the

[HACKERS] Standby receiving part of missing WAL segment

2015-02-11 Thread Thom Brown
Hi, Today I witnessed a situation which appears to have gone down like this: - The primary server starting streaming WAL data from segment 00A8 to the standby - The standby server started receiving that data - Before 00A8 is finished, the wal sender process dies on the primary, but the archiver