RE: [HACKERS] Status of JDBC Interface

2000-12-22 Thread Peter Mount
TECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 6:30 PM > To: Peter Mount > Cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces (E-mail); PostgreSQL Developers > List (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Status of JDBC Interface > > > Peter Mount writes: > > > 1) ANT vs Make > > > I su

Re: [HACKERS] Status of JDBC Interface

2000-12-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Peter Mount writes: > 1) ANT vs Make > I suggest we keep supporting both methods for now to see how people get on. If you're confident about ANT is suggest that you dump the make interface because otherwise you increase the possible failure scenarios at the install level alone in combinatorial

[HACKERS] Status of JDBC Interface

2000-12-20 Thread Peter Mount
Ok, after being a little quiet recently things are picking up (well at least for now). Anyhow, here's whats happening on the JDBC front: 1) ANT vs Make As someone (sorry forgotten your name) suggested using ANT instead of Make for building the driver. Well yesterday was pretty quiet here so I f