Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 15. Oktober 2004 06:24 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > I have modified these reports so they print the full path used.
> >
> > Typical pg_dumpall output is:
> >
> > The program "pg_dump" is needed by pg_dumpall but was not found in the
> > same directory as "/usr/
Am Freitag, 15. Oktober 2004 06:24 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> I have modified these reports so they print the full path used.
>
> Typical pg_dumpall output is:
>
> The program "pg_dump" is needed by pg_dumpall but was not found in the
> same directory as "/usr/local/postgres/bin/pg_dumpall".
> Che
I have modified these reports so they print the full path used.
Typical pg_dumpall output is:
The program "pg_dump" is needed by pg_dumpall but was not found in the
same directory as "/usr/local/postgres/bin/pg_dumpall".
Check your installation.
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shouldn't the second progname be argv[0] or something else that contains
> the full path?
argv[0] doesn't necessarily contain the full path. Is it worth calling
find_my_exec() here to produce an absolute path? Possibly...
r
What is this trying to tell us?
if (ret == -1)
fprintf(stderr,
_("The program \"postgres\" is needed by %s "
"but was not found in the same directory as \"%s\".\n"
"Check your insta
