Hi, Pavan,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Pavan Deolasee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Fujii Masao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the database whose timeline is the same as the primary's
exists in the standby, 2)3) getting new online-backup is not
necessary. For
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Fujii Masao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, I would expect this to be integrated with server. I would expect
code to live in src/postmaster/walreceiver.c, with main logic in a file
alongside xlog.c, perhaps xreceive.c. We would start WALReceiver when we
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Fujii Masao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Start postgres in the primary
2) Get an online-backup in the primary
3) Locate the online-backup in the standby
4) Start postgres (with walreceiver) in the standby
# Configure restore_command, host of the primary and
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Fujii Masao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the database whose timeline is the same as the primary's
exists in the standby, 2)3) getting new online-backup is not
necessary. For example, after the standby falls down, the
database at that time is applicable to
Hi, Simon,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:59 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi, thank you for taking time to review the patch.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi Fujii,
Here's some initial thoughts on the structure of this. I've deliberately
not yet read other comments, so we have some independent viewpoints.
Sorry if that means we end up saying same thing twice.
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 20:36 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
1) Walsender
This is new
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:59 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi, thank you for taking time to review the patch.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fujii Masao wrote:
Attached is a patch for a synchronous log-shipping replication which
was discussed
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think we would want this integrated into the server as an
additional special backend, similar to WALWriter. If it works for now,
that's fine for other testing. This is not an especially difficult
change, I
Fujii Masao wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAICS, there's no security, at all. Anyone that can log in, can become a
WAL sender, and receive all WAL for the whole cluster.
One simple solution is to define the database only for replication.
Hi, thank you for taking time to review the patch.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fujii Masao wrote:
Attached is a patch for a synchronous log-shipping replication which
was discussed just a month ago. I would like you to review this patch
in
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fujii Masao wrote:
And, there are some problems in this patch;
* This patch is somewhat big, though it should be subdivided for
review.
* Source code comments and documents are insufficient.
Is it against the
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fujii Masao wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAICS, there's no security, at all. Anyone that can log in, can become a
WAL sender, and receive all WAL for the
Hi
Attached is a patch for a synchronous log-shipping replication which
was discussed just a month ago. I would like you to review this patch
in Nov commit fest.
The outline of this patch is as follow;
1) Walsender
This is new process to focus on sending xlog through the position
which a
Fujii Masao wrote:
And, there are some problems in this patch;
* This patch is somewhat big, though it should be subdivided for
review.
* Source code comments and documents are insufficient.
Is it against the rule of commit fest to add such a status patch
into review-queue? If so, I would
Fujii Masao wrote:
Attached is a patch for a synchronous log-shipping replication which
was discussed just a month ago. I would like you to review this patch
in Nov commit fest.
Here's some first quick comments:
AFAICS, there's no security, at all. Anyone that can log in, can become
a WAL
15 matches
Mail list logo
