kevin brintnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you suggesting that the pair (reloid,attnum) is superior for
> identifying a pg_attribute entry?
Yes. It's just as unique, and it makes it easy to see the relationship
between the table and its columns. Moreover, it's what we're already
using in
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:09:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> kevin brintnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * add OID column to pg_attribute. This permits dependencies to be
> >registered correctly in pg_shdepend.
>
> No, no ... the precedent in pg_depend is that columns are represented as
>
kevin brintnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * add OID column to pg_attribute. This permits dependencies to be
>registered correctly in pg_shdepend.
No, no ... the precedent in pg_depend is that columns are represented as
the table's OID plus a column number. Please don't invent some rando
Fellow Hackers,
I've been working on this item for a little while, and I'm starting to see
some code come together. I wanted to solicit some feedback before I got
too far along to make sure I'm on the right track.
Here's a rough overview of what I've done so far:
---
