On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:27:06AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
It's not. And I personally don't think it would be a problem.
But I think it'll be a lot easier to sell to those who prefer
textfiles in cvs (hello
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:03:13AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
If you change the text file, I will see the CVS update and update the
HTML --- I will never lose a change because my CVS sees your changes.
That seems like a lot of extra work that should be
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:03:13AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
We need it to do a few things:
Actually, the part of the current process that a wiki would fail to
reproduce is the emails that Bruce sends out about TODO changes.
Do we still want those,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:36:52AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:03:13AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
We need it to do a few things:
Actually, the part of the current process that a wiki would fail to
reproduce is the emails
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Actually, the part of the current process that a wiki would fail to
reproduce is the emails that Bruce sends out about TODO changes.
Do we still want those, and if so what would we do about it?
Magnus said you can subscribe to a changes
Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:03:13AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
We need it to do a few things:
Actually, the part of the current process that a wiki would fail to
reproduce is the emails that Bruce sends out about TODO changes.
Do
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Actually, the part of the current process that a wiki would fail to
reproduce is the emails that Bruce sends out about TODO changes.
Do we still want those, and if so what would we do about it?
Magnus said you can