Re: [HACKERS] TODO 9.0 done items removed

2010-08-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 08/09/2010 09:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > "David E. Wheeler" writes: > >> On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> I figured it out; done: > >>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 > >> Jeepers. That's a long list! > > Uh, there seems to be qui

Re: [HACKERS] TODO 9.0 done items removed

2010-08-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > "David E. Wheeler" writes: > > On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I figured it out; done: > >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 > > > Jeepers. That's a long list! > > Uh, there seems to be quite a lot there that is *not* done in 9.0. > In fact, non

Re: [HACKERS] TODO 9.0 done items removed

2010-08-09 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 08/09/2010 09:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote: "David E. Wheeler" writes: On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: I figured it out; done: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 Jeepe

Re: [HACKERS] TODO 9.0 done items removed

2010-08-09 Thread Tom Lane
"David E. Wheeler" writes: > On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I figured it out; done: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 > Jeepers. That's a long list! Uh, there seems to be quite a lot there that is *not* done in 9.0. In fact, none of the first page's worth are do

Re: [HACKERS] TODO 9.0 done items removed

2010-08-09 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I figured it out; done: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 Jeepers. That's a long list! David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresq

Re: [HACKERS] TODO 9.0 done items removed

2010-08-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of sb jul 17 21:21:52 -0400 > > 2010: > > > Since we branched 9.1 before we released Postgres 9.0, I had to remove > > > the 9.0 TODO items before 9.0 was released, or people might have marked > > > items as "done" when they were do

Re: [HACKERS] TODO 9.0 done items removed

2010-07-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of s??b jul 17 21:21:52 -0400 2010: > > Since we branched 9.1 before we released Postgres 9.0, I had to remove > > the 9.0 TODO items before 9.0 was released, or people might have marked > > items as "done" when they were done only in 9.

Re: [HACKERS] TODO 9.0 done items removed

2010-07-19 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of sáb jul 17 21:21:52 -0400 2010: > Since we branched 9.1 before we released Postgres 9.0, I had to remove > the 9.0 TODO items before 9.0 was released, or people might have marked > items as "done" when they were done only in 9.1. Should we create a TodoDone

[HACKERS] TODO 9.0 done items removed

2010-07-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
Since we branched 9.1 before we released Postgres 9.0, I had to remove the 9.0 TODO items before 9.0 was released, or people might have marked items as "done" when they were done only in 9.1. I also updated the TODO legend at the top to mention 9.1: [D] Completed item - marks changes that