Added to TODO:
o %Allow per-database permissions to be set via GRANT
Allow database connection checks based on GRANT rules in
addition to the existing access checks in pg_hba.conf.
and remove:
o %Allow pg_hba.conf settings to be controlled via SQL
Thi
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It should be easy to make this code understand a new privilege type.
Another point worth making: most of the actual patch will probably
consist of teaching the ACL datatype code about another possible
bit-value in ACL masks. A lot of the generic GRANT/
Cool :) Thank you :)
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:05 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>
> > > I'm not sure if you realize it, but this should be an extremely small
> > > patch. In particular, if you think you need to change the parser then
> > > you are already off on the wrong
Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> > I'm not sure if you realize it, but this should be an extremely small
> > patch. In particular, if you think you need to change the parser then
> > you are already off on the wrong track. The parser doesn't know
> > anything about specific privilege types (as of 8.1 an
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 14:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Gevik Babakhani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Would it be correct to state that: only the authentication
> > is checked (username and password) when connecting to the
> > server and not the any kind of privilege to access a database.
>
> Wel
"Gevik Babakhani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be correct to state that: only the authentication
> is checked (username and password) when connecting to the
> server and not the any kind of privilege to access a database.
Well, that would be the typical usage, ie, people relying on CONNE
Hi,
I read the discussion thread once again and unless I am absolutely
and totally on the wrong track this is what I understood from the
general plan to be. The current pg_hba.conf provides the famous
the host based mechanism to connect to a database.
In order to add the discussed functionality we