On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Don Baccus wrote:
> It's just type extensibility, really.
Yeah.
> As to why, again there's an efficiency argument, as I said earlier some
> joins can be avoided given PG's implementation of this feature:
> [TI and relational examples deleted]
What you gave is not the relat
Curt Sampson wrote:
> The last question comes up because, during the conversation up to this
> point, we seem to have implicitly accepted that table inheritance is
> an "object-oriented" way of doing things. Thinking further on this,
> however, I've decided that it's not in fact object-oriented a
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Jordan Henderson wrote:
> I think what would be useful is to discuss the theory part.
As do I.
> - Date has 3, however his most current work is dated 2000, The Third
> Manifesto SECOND EDITION.
This is actually Date and Darwen.
I think we should also add Date's _An Introdu
