Claudio Natoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How are you dealing with the issue of wanting some static variables to >> be per-thread and others not?
> To be perfectly honest, I'm still trying to familiarize myself with the code > sufficiently well so that I can tell which variables need to be per-thread > and which are shared (and, in turn, which of these need to be protected from > concurrent access). Well, the first-order approximation would be to duplicate the current fork semantics: *all* static variables are per-thread, and should be copied from the parent thread at thread creation. If there is some reasonably non-invasive way to do that, we'd have a long leg up on the problem. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match