On Nov 5, 2014 5:27 PM, "Kevin Grittner" wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > ISTM that by now we could just flat-out remove it.
>
> +1
>
+1.
I thought we had already removed it years ago :-)
/Magnus
Tom Lane wrote:
> ISTM that by now we could just flat-out remove it.
+1
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/m
There's a thread over in pgsql-admin
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1317404836.812502.1415174912912.javamail.ya...@jws11120.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
suggesting that the server-side autocommit GUC causes more confusion
than it's worth, because newbies think it should reflect the state of
client