Re: [HACKERS] Time to remove dummy autocommit GUC?

2014-11-05 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Nov 5, 2014 5:27 PM, "Kevin Grittner" wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > ISTM that by now we could just flat-out remove it. > > +1 > +1. I thought we had already removed it years ago :-) /Magnus

Re: [HACKERS] Time to remove dummy autocommit GUC?

2014-11-05 Thread Kevin Grittner
Tom Lane wrote: > ISTM that by now we could just flat-out remove it. +1 -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/m

[HACKERS] Time to remove dummy autocommit GUC?

2014-11-05 Thread Tom Lane
There's a thread over in pgsql-admin http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1317404836.812502.1415174912912.javamail.ya...@jws11120.mail.ir2.yahoo.com suggesting that the server-side autocommit GUC causes more confusion than it's worth, because newbies think it should reflect the state of client