[HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-06 Thread Justin Clift
Hi guys, Just wondering if we are going to release a version 7.1.3 or not? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competi

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-07 Thread Marc G. Fournier
I'm missing an email here somewhere, and apologize ... I'm just getting my mailboxes back in order now after moving to a dial-up link vs high speed (moved to a non-high-speed neighboorhood *sigh*) ... Tom, can you resend that list of changes you sent to me earlier? On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Justin Cl

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-07 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (moved to a non-high-speed neighboorhood *sigh*) ... Ugh :-( > Tom, can you resend that list of changes you sent to me earlier? Attached is the updated list. Note there are a couple of changes listed that aren't actually in REL7_1_STABLE yet, bu

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-07 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If we decide to release 7.1.3 I'd like to see our patch for > > contrib/intarray too. > > Which one? Patch I've submitted last week. It's in current CVS http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1028099 om,

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-08 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to handle >> the documentation updates and release branding? > Yes, just tell me when to start. I don't know of any reason to wait... anyone else? regards, tom lane

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-08 Thread Tom Lane
Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Not me, but I'm curious as to how far away 7.2 is? I'd like to go beta by the end of the month. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at on

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-07 Thread Oleg Bartunov
If we decide to release 7.1.3 I'd like to see our patch for contrib/intarray too. Oleg On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > (moved to a non-high-speed neighboorhood *sigh*) ... > > Ugh :-( > > > Tom, can you resend that list of changes

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-08 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to handle > >> the documentation updates and release branding? > > > Yes, just tell me when to start. > > I don't know of any reason to wait... anyone else? > I have

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
go for it, and I'll try and do up a v7.1.3 during the day tomorrow ... On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to handle > >> the documentation updates and release branding? > > > Yes, jus

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > > > The list looks good to me as far as doing a v7.1.3 ... anyone object to > > it? > > Not me, but I'm curious as to how far away 7.2 is? Oct-ish sometime ... > > Vince. > > > > > On Tue, 7 Aug

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
I think we are on hold for Hiroshi, right? > > go for it, and I'll try and do up a v7.1.3 during the day tomorrow ... > > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to handle > > >> t

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we are on hold for Hiroshi, right? Yes. I believe I know which patch he's referring to --- it's the only change in src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c since 7.1. If he hasn't committed in a few hours I can take care of back-patching it. It must be pu

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
> I said: > > Okay, I'll wrap up the last couple of back-patches this evening... > > Done. A couple of the patches that I had my eye on turned out not to be > relevant to 7.1 (they were fixes in new code). So attached is the > current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to han

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-12 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think we are on hold for Hiroshi, right? > > Yes. I believe I know which patch he's referring to --- it's the only > change in src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c since 7.1. If he hasn't committed > in a few hours I

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to handle > > >> the documentation updates and release branding? > > > > > Yes, just tell me when to start. > > > > I don't know of any reason to wait... anyo

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-14 Thread Tom Lane
Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we decide to release 7.1.3 I'd like to see our patch for > contrib/intarray too. Which one? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet,

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-13 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes: > That's a couple of days ago now... anything happening? Bruce is evidently waiting on Hiroshi's confirmation that he's done applying his back-patches. I believe he is, though; he did apply what I thought was the patch he had i

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes: > > That's a couple of days ago now... anything happening? > > Bruce is evidently waiting on Hiroshi's confirmation that he's done > applying his back-patches. I believe he is, though; he did apply > what I thought was the pa

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-14 Thread Marc G. Fournier
let me know once you are complete, and i'll wrap her up ... On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I will get on this today. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes: > > > That's a couple of days ago now... anything happening? > > > > Bruce is evidently

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-14 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday 07 August 2001 14:56, Tom Lane wrote: Ok. This is the second time I have seen this message -- but this one is delayed by a week. Marc? -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading t

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
I will get on this today. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes: > > That's a couple of days ago now... anything happening? > > Bruce is evidently waiting on Hiroshi's confirmation that he's done > applying his back-patches. I believe he is, though; he did apply