On 4 February 2013 15:52, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> There is a bug in hot_standby_feedback that causes the xmin of the
>> walsender process to not be reset when hot_standby_feedback is turned
>> off after it had previously sent at least one feedbac
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> There is a bug in hot_standby_feedback that causes the xmin of the
> walsender process to not be reset when hot_standby_feedback is turned
> off after it had previously sent at least one feedback message.
>
> Clearly, that is a bad thing and des
There is a bug in hot_standby_feedback that causes the xmin of the
walsender process to not be reset when hot_standby_feedback is turned
off after it had previously sent at least one feedback message.
Clearly, that is a bad thing and deserves backpatching to 9.1, unless
I hear otherwise real soon.
