mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Chris Browne wrote:
>> mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> *) also, isn't it possible to
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Chris Browne wrote:
> mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
*) also, isn't it possible to change text cast influencing GUCs 'n'
times p
Chris Browne writes:
> mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
>> yeah -- perhaps you shouldn't be allowed set things like datestyle in
>> functions then.
> That would cause grief for Slony-I, methinks, and probably other things
> that behave somewhat similar.
Yeah, it's not really practical
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Chris Browne wrote:
> mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
*) also, isn't it possible to change text cast influencing GUCs 'n'
times p
mmonc...@gmail.com (Merlin Moncure) writes:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>> *) also, isn't it possible to change text cast influencing GUCs 'n'
>>> times per statement considering any query can call a function and a
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> *) also, isn't it possible to change text cast influencing GUCs 'n'
>> times per statement considering any query can call a function and any
>> function can say, change datestyle? Should
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> *) also, isn't it possible to change text cast influencing GUCs 'n'
> times per statement considering any query can call a function and any
> function can say, change datestyle? Shouldn't the related functions
> be marked 'volatile', not sta
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Merlin Moncure writes:
>> While chatting with Haas off-list regarding how the new array/string
>> functions should work (see the thread in its glory here:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg148865.html)
>> the debate m
Merlin Moncure writes:
> While chatting with Haas off-list regarding how the new array/string
> functions should work (see the thread in its glory here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg148865.html)
> the debate morphed into the relative pros and cons about the propos
While chatting with Haas off-list regarding how the new array/string
functions should work (see the thread in its glory here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg148865.html)
the debate morphed into the relative pros and cons about the proposed
concat() being marked stable
10 matches
Mail list logo