On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:32:33 -0700 (PDT), Stephan Szabo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Ian Barwick wrote:
>
> > Apologies if this has been covered previously.
> >
> > Given a statement like this:
> > SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM bar)
> > I would expect it to f
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:33:44 +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 July 2004 01:15, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > Apologies if this has been covered previously.
> >
> > Given a statement like this:
> > SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM bar)
> > I would expect
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 01:15, Ian Barwick wrote:
> Apologies if this has been covered previously.
>
> Given a statement like this:
> SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM bar)
> I would expect it to fail if "bar" does not have a column "id". The
> test case below (tested in 7.4.3 and 7.4
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Ian Barwick wrote:
> Apologies if this has been covered previously.
>
> Given a statement like this:
> SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM bar)
> I would expect it to fail if "bar" does not have a column "id". The
> test case below (tested in 7.4.3 and 7.4.1) shows
Apologies if this has been covered previously.
Given a statement like this:
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM bar)
I would expect it to fail if "bar" does not have a column "id". The
test case below (tested in 7.4.3 and 7.4.1) shows this statement
will however appear succeed, but pro
