On 23 March 2012 14:03, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In streaming replication, after failover, new master might have lots
>>> of un-applied
>>> WAL files with old timeline ID. They
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:03:27PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >> In streaming replication, after failover, new master might have lots
> >> of un-applied
> >> WAL files with old timeline ID. They are the WAL files which were recycled
> >> as
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On second thought, I found other issues about WAL archiving after
> failover. So let me clarify the issues again.
>
> Just after failover, there can be three kinds of WAL files in new
> master's pg_xlog directory:
>
> (1) WAL files which were
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In streaming replication, after failover, new master might have lots
>> of un-applied
>> WAL files with old timeline ID. They are the WAL files which were recycled
>> as a
>> f
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In streaming replication, after failover, new master might have lots
> of un-applied
> WAL files with old timeline ID. They are the WAL files which were recycled as
> a
> future ones when the server was running as a standby. Since they
Hi,
In streaming replication, after failover, new master might have lots
of un-applied
WAL files with old timeline ID. They are the WAL files which were recycled as a
future ones when the server was running as a standby. Since they will never be
used later, they don't need to be archived after fai
