""Jim C. Nasby"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> There a patched build available for testing? (I'd rather not have to
> figure out how to get windows builds working, unless there's some kind
> of instructions somewhere...)
> --
Not yet - the patch is still pending.
Regards,
Qingqing
--
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:23:07AM +0800, Qingqing Zhou wrote:
>
> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:17:07PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > >> Here's one to add to the list: running pgbench with a moderately heavy
> > >> load
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:17:07PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >> Here's one to add to the list: running pgbench with a moderately heavy
> >> load on an SMP box likes to trigger a state where the database (or
> >> pgbench)
Bruce Momjian said:
> Folks, my mailbox is filling with unresolved Win32 bug reports,
> specifically:
>
> integer division
> shared memory
> statistics collector
> rename
> fsync
>
> I have put the emails at the bottom of the patches_hold queue:
>
> http://momjia
; To: Larry Rosenman
> Cc: Magnus Hagander; Martijn van Oosterhout; Bruce Momjian;
> PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unresolved Win32 bug reports
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:17:35PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > It seems to han
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:17:35PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > It seems to hang up just fine on my XPSP2, PG 8.1.2 HTT box.
> >
> > :(
> >
> > LER
>
> I may have spoken too soon :(
I took a look and in fact the machine was just disk bound, so it appears
that either HT doesn't exhibit this
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:06:30PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> It reuqires a multi-CPU box, right? I don't hav eone with pgwin32 on
>>> ATM. Do you know if it's enough with hyperthreading?
>>
>> Hrm... not sure. Let me see if I can find a box wi
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:06:30PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> It reuqires a multi-CPU box, right? I don't hav eone with pgwin32 on
>> ATM. Do you know if it's enough with hyperthreading?
>
> Hrm... not sure. Let me see if I can find a box with HT here and test
> it. Run
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:06:30PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> It reuqires a multi-CPU box, right? I don't hav eone with pgwin32 on
> ATM. Do you know if it's enough with hyperthreading?
Hrm... not sure. Let me see if I can find a box with HT here and test
it. Running the following batch file
> > > pgbench) just stops doing work (CPU usage drops to
> nothing, as does
> > > disk activity). I've been able to repro this on 2 Intel
> boxes (one a
> > > 2 way, one a 4 way), and a dual Opteron, all running the
> latest windows binary.
> > > A 50 connection test running 1000 transactions
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:17:07PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Here's one to add to the list: running pgbench with a moderately heavy
>> load on an SMP box likes to trigger a state where the database (or
>> pgbench) just stops doing work (CPU usage drops to nothi
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 07:25:15PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:17:07PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > Here's one to add to the list: running pgbench with a moderately heavy
> > load on an SMP box likes to trigger a state where the database (or
> > pgbench) just
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:17:07PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Here's one to add to the list: running pgbench with a moderately heavy
> load on an SMP box likes to trigger a state where the database (or
> pgbench) just stops doing work (CPU usage drops to nothing, as does disk
> activity). I've be
Here's one to add to the list: running pgbench with a moderately heavy
load on an SMP box likes to trigger a state where the database (or
pgbench) just stops doing work (CPU usage drops to nothing, as does disk
activity). I've been able to repro this on 2 Intel boxes (one a 2 way,
one a 4 way), and
Folks, my mailbox is filling with unresolved Win32 bug reports,
specifically:
integer division
shared memory
statistics collector
rename
fsync
I have put the emails at the bottom of the patches_hold queue:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpa
15 matches
Mail list logo
