Tom Lane wrote:
> See past discussions about appropriate handling of unlabeled numeric
> constants. This is a tricky area that needs a thoroughgoing rethink.
> If you go into it with only "fix uint4" in mind then you will almost
> certainly make things worse.
Gosh, you were certainly right there
Adriaan Joubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uggh, this needs some help. I've got the problem that I can insert a
> value bigger than MAXINT into an int8 column, but when I try to do the
> same for a uint4 column, the parser coerces it into an int4, as in:
See past discussions about appropriate
Uggh, this needs some help. I've got the problem that I can insert a
value bigger than MAXINT into an int8 column, but when I try to do the
same for a uint4 column, the parser coerces it into an int4, as in:
test=# insert into tint8 values (3043140617);
INSERT 30254 1
test=# insert into tuint4 va