On 31 Jul 2015 11:59, "Tatsuo Ishii" wrote:
>
> > On 31 Jul 2015 10:15, "Tatsuo Ishii" wrote:
> >>
> >> > I think it would be nice to have... but not to the point of working
on
> >> > it myself.
> >> >
> >> > Might be worth an email to -general to see how many people have
> >> > immediate use for
> On 31 Jul 2015 10:15, "Tatsuo Ishii" wrote:
>>
>> > I think it would be nice to have... but not to the point of working on
>> > it myself.
>> >
>> > Might be worth an email to -general to see how many people have
>> > immediate use for it.
>>
>> What I am thinking about is,
>>
>> 1) Implement ce
> I think it would be nice to have... but not to the point of working on
> it myself.
>
> Might be worth an email to -general to see how many people have
> immediate use for it.
What I am thinking about is,
1) Implement certain class of updatable views allowed in SQL:1999
(UNION ALL, natural
On 7/30/15 1:03 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Is anyone working on implementing or interested in implementing
automatic updatable view which uses two or more tables involved
(join)? SQL1999 allows it in certain conditions.
I think it would be nice to have... but not to the point of working on
it mys
Hi,
Is anyone working on implementing or interested in implementing
automatic updatable view which uses two or more tables involved
(join)? SQL1999 allows it in certain conditions.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.
On 18 October 2013 15:43, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> Committed.
>
Excellent. Thank you!
And thank you Marko for your thorough review.
Regards,
Dean
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 2013-09-17 12:53, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the review. Those changes all look sensible to me.
>>
>> Here's an updated patch incorporating all your fixes, and rebased to
>> apply without offsets.
>
>
> Looks good to me. Markin
On 2013-09-17 12:53, Dean Rasheed wrote:
Thanks for the review. Those changes all look sensible to me.
Here's an updated patch incorporating all your fixes, and rebased to
apply without offsets.
Looks good to me. Marking this one ready for committer.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
--
Sent via pg
Hi Dean,
First of all, thanks for working on this!
The patch compiles and applies fine (though with offsets). The feature
is in the SQL standard, and further improves an existing feature.
Some stuff I've spotted and fixed in the attached patch (hope you don't
mind, thought it'd be easier to
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 15:27 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> Attached is a work-in-progress patch to extend auto-updatable views to
> support views containing a mix of updatable and non-updatable columns.
> This is basically the "columns" part of SQL Feature T111, "Updatable
> joins, unions, and column
10 matches
Mail list logo
