[ returning from the wilds of Kentucky... ]
Stephen Frost writes:
> * Craig Ringer (cr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
>> Personally I'd be fine with 100 or so, but when I'm using buffers side by
>> side, or when I'm working in poor conditions where I've set my terminal to
>> "giant old people text" s
Craig, all,
* Craig Ringer (cr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 21 August 2017 at 10:36, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Robert Haas
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Andres Freund
> > wrote:
> > >> We currently still have the guideline that code s
Andres Freund wrote:
> We currently still have the guideline that code should fit into an 80
> character window. But an increasing amount of the code, and code
> submissions, don't adhere to that (e.g. copy.c, which triggered me to
> write this email). And I mean outside of accepted "exceptions" l
On 21 August 2017 at 10:36, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Robert Haas
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Andres Freund
> wrote:
> >> We currently still have the guideline that code should fit into an 80
> >> character window. But an increasing amount of
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hm. Because you're used to it, or because more of them fit on the
> screen?
Both. It's also the default window size on my MacBook.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via
On 2017-08-21 11:36:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> We currently still have the guideline that code should fit into an 80
> >> character window. But an increasing amount of the
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> We currently still have the guideline that code should fit into an 80
>> character window. But an increasing amount of the code, and code
>> submissions, don't adhere to that (e.g. cop
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> We currently still have the guideline that code should fit into an 80
> character window. But an increasing amount of the code, and code
> submissions, don't adhere to that (e.g. copy.c, which triggered me to
> write this email). And I mean
On 08/20/2017 09:32 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2017-08-20 09:29:39 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 08/20/2017 07:49 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
We currently still have the guideline that code should fit into an 80
character window. But an increasing amount of the code, and code
submissions,
On 2017-08-20 09:29:39 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 08/20/2017 07:49 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We currently still have the guideline that code should fit into an 80
> > character window. But an increasing amount of the code, and code
> > submissions, don't adhere to that (e.g.
On 08/20/2017 07:49 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
We currently still have the guideline that code should fit into an 80
character window. But an increasing amount of the code, and code
submissions, don't adhere to that (e.g. copy.c, which triggered me to
write this email). And I mean outside of a
Hi,
We currently still have the guideline that code should fit into an 80
character window. But an increasing amount of the code, and code
submissions, don't adhere to that (e.g. copy.c, which triggered me to
write this email). And I mean outside of accepted "exceptions" like
error messages. And
12 matches
Mail list logo
